Not Feeling Lucky

"Diligence is the mother of good luck." - Ben Franklin

I guess it's been the better part of a decade since I first encountered the term "lucky imaging" that is used in amateur astronomy to characterize the technique of stacking and enhancing video frames to produce the stunning planetary, lunar, and solar images that we see so often today. The moniker derives from the fact that we are able to extract those brief, "lucky" moments when the seeing has steadied for a split second to create a photo that reveals details the eye could never behold. Indeed, not just our eyes, but those of us old enough to have tried capture using film greatly appreciate the superior results (and in many ways the simplicity) of using this digital video approach.

While the term has a rational basis for its origin, I have to confess it has never sat quite right with me. Using it connotates that I pointed my telescope at my target, yelled "action!" and hoped for the best. If the imaging gods smiled on me then I was rewarded with a detailed image of  Mars revealing Olympus Mons or kilometer-sized craters on the floor Plato. If they did not I was left with a fuzzy outcome that no amount of post-processing could salvage. Better luck next time kid! 

Of course, any serious solar system imager knows that aside from decent seeing, luck is a rather small component of creating a nice capture of your target. There is the research into what equipment to use and the financial investment in acquiring it. That equipment then often needs a knowledgeable and skilled hand for optical alignment (collimation) to wring every last sub-arcsecond detail from our quarry. Once that is checked one needs to engage in a successful polar alignment to enable tracking of the object at high magnification. If an Atmospheric Distortion Corrector (ADC) in your imaging train then that, too, must be adjusted throughout the imaging session to combat the subtle smearing that occurs when light travels through our home planet's blanket of air. 

One of the biggest challenges is achieving a sharp focus. "Lucky" imagers do not get the benefit of a Bahtinov mask to provide the assurance that they have a crisp image. The user must study the image on the screen to identify a high-contrast feature to zero in on and then twiddle the knob incrementally back and forth while evaluating the outcome after each minute adjustment. If being done by hand that means waiting a few moments after each tweak for the target to stop dancing around the field. (Those of us who have outfitted our scope with an electronic focuser would never part with it!) 

Once collimated, polar aligned, and focused it's on to setting up the gain and exposure in the software's capture interface. Having the fastest possible shutter speed while holding the graininess of the capture at bay is another balancing act that the imager has to perform. Finally, we're ready to capture some video!

With gigabytes of data safely stored on the hard drive you're halfway home. Next comes the post-processing effort where we transform those thousands of frames into a single thing of beauty. But between those two points lies a bevy of software products to perform that magical massage, and the time to learn how to use them. One of the most critical stages, the wavelet sharpening, is part science but very heavy on art. Here the observer must use their skills to sharpen the stacked outcome in such a way as to provide the clearest view that does not introduce artifacts into the final product. Only after all this effort based upon investment in equipment, study, and experience does the reward of a detailed photograph of a member of the solar system emerge. 

Lucky? Really? 

I may be tilting at windmills here, but I am launching a campaign to retire the "lucky imaging" description for a more appropriate acronym. I asked the question on the Cloudy Nights forum and got some interesting (and humorous!) suggestions along with pretty universal support to call our technique something else. Some of them contained the word "planetary" in the acronym, which would describe most of my personal effort but snub the amazing work done by Solar and Lunar imagers. After collecting descriptive terms and jockeying them around I think I finally have the replacement acronym:

Solar, Planetary, and Lunar Imaging Capture & Enhancement (SPLICE)

Not only does it cover the targets for which we most often apply the technique, the "splice" has a slight double entendre in that in many ways that is at the heart of what we do - gather the best parts of our movie and then splice them together for our finished product. 

Coming up with a suitable acronym is certainly the easier part of this effort. The real challenge will be to get our favorite print publications (and other influencers such as podcasters and YouTube creators) to adopt it. It's up to us to ask them to remove "lucky imaging" from the amateur astronomy lexicon!