Thursday, February 26, 2026

An All-Nighter with Jove

I always look forward to Jupiter oppositions in the winter zodiac. The current apparition has the giant planet hosted among the stars of Gemini, riding about as high as possible in the night sky for mid‑northern observers. The combination of it gliding above the worst of the turbulent atmospheric and long January nights (where in theory you might capture an entire rotation in a single session) are exciting prospects.

But winter is winter - especially in the Baltimore area. The cold is one thing to contend with, but even more of a spoiler are the clouds and unstable seeing. I’ve often felt that our region’s winter skies offer fewer usable nights than any other season, and it turns out that impression isn’t just grumbling. According to long‑term climatology, the region’s winter sky is overcast or mostly cloudy about half the time. And while I cannot find data on “seeing” I would bet we get most clear nights checking in at a 1-2 seeing level on the scale of 1-10.

Which is why the night of January 7–8, 2026 felt like such a small miracle.


The forecast from Astrospheric earlier that day told the usual winter story: cloud cover and seeing models leaning pessimistic, barely reaching “acceptable” levels. The kind of forecast that normally has me planning a short session – an hour, maybe ninety minutes – before the clouds roll in or the seeing collapses (or the cold gets the best of me). But heck, why not roll the dice? After all, Jupiter was a couple days from opposition, so prime time.

When I stepped outside around 8:30 PM, the first surprise was the temperature. It wasn’t bitterly cold, which meant I could stay chair‑side instead of retreating indoors between captures. I’d already set the scope out earlier to cool so I started my “pre-flight checklist”

  • Confirm the spotting scope alignment
  • Dial in a very solid collimation
  • Check transparency (a respectable 7–8 by my estimate)
  • Gauge the seeing (somewhere between 3 and 5, with brief moments of better steadiness)

With the QHY camera running through SharpCap, I was getting a very respectable 130+ fps in white light. I began a cadence of four‑run sequences every 15–20 minutes, each run a two‑minute capture. Europa was approaching the disk, with a transit predicted just after midnight – another incentive to keep going as long as the sky allowed.

And, surprisingly, the sky did cooperate. As I wrapped up each imaging run I was like a gambler pushing his luck, thinking “just one more capture before you call it quits”. Before I knew it, it was midnight and I had seen about half a Jupiter rotation at this point. Now my appetite was whetted for that elusive full rotation capture. I did some quick calculations in my head and figured I’d have to hang in there until close to 4 a.m. in order to see the GRS, which had started off setting, come back into view. I decided to go for it and did a meridian flip to ensure I could track the giant planet as it headed west in the sky.


I continued performing imaging captures but now roughly every 30-60 minutes, retreating inside between them not so much to warm up but to put my feet up and get a little rest. The days of staying up all night and at my scope may well be behind me!

By 3 a.m. I could see that some patchy clouds were finally working their way into my region, dropping the transparency a bit. About an hour later the Moon showed a bit of a halo around it, further evidence of deteriorating conditions. And while that sort of haze is not always a killer for seeing, in this instance I could see that it, too, was slipping as the early morning wore on. I took the final sequence at from 4:15–4:30 a.m. with the seeing slipping down to about a 3. But I had it – there was the GRS rising into view signaling I had seen the full planet’s cloud features pass in front of me.  

Despite the uneven seeing in the early morning hours, the dataset was strong enough to build a full cylindrical map in WinJUPOS. The region around the GRS is a little darker than ideal, but that’s simply the geometry of the night: I never caught it near the central meridian, so the limb‑darkened frames had to carry that section. Still, the map is a personal accomplishment that captures the character of Jupiter beautifully for that date, revealing many long-term features such as the GRS, Oval BA, the SSTB storms, and many others!

Yes, nights like that are rare in January. The forecasts don’t encourage you. The statistics don’t encourage you. And yet, every so often, the sky relents just enough to reward persistence. My reward on this night was a nearly full rotation, a Europa transit, some enjoyable visual observing of the planet between imaging runs, and a cool map documenting Jupiter as it came to opposition in 2026. Yep - if this is how my 2026 observing is going to go, I’ll take it!

Thursday, January 29, 2026

Test Driving the Seestar S50

For a while now I’ve had mixed feelings about the new generation of “smart telescopes.” On one hand, they make astrophotography astonishingly easy - almost too easy. On the other, they lack that soulful connection you get when you lean into an eyepiece and let ancient photons fall directly onto your retina. I’ve written about this tension before.

So when the Howard Astronomical League set up a Seestar S50 loaner program, I finally got around to signing up. Curiosity won out. I wanted to see whether this little automated wonder would feel like a shortcut or a revelation.

Unpacking the Little Robot

The club keeps the Seestar neatly packed in a compact carrying case, along with a sturdy tripod that’s a major upgrade from the tiny one ZWO ships with the unit. They also included a micro–leveler, a excellent addition that makes fine-tuning the setup much easier and helps ensure accurate tracking and plate solving.

Before my first night out, I watched a few tutorial videos and ran through the pre-flight checklist: compass calibration, app installation, all the usual rituals of modern astronomy.


Field Test: Suburbia vs. 10-Second Exposures

All my testing happened in my Towson backyard, which sits squarely in Bortle 8 territory. If the Seestar could perform here, it likely could perform anywhere. I spent some time scouting the darkest corners of the yard, trying to dodge the neighbor’s floodlight on one side and a porchlight on the other.

My first clear night came on November 23rd in the form of a crisp, 40° temps under clear skies, well suited for a trial run.

The app interface took a little getting used to. At first I kept losing track of how to return to the live stacking view, but after a few minutes the layout started to make sense. Once leveled, the Seestar slewed to my first target: M1, the Crab Nebula.

And then the magic happened.


Within a couple of 10-second exposures, a ghostly patch appeared on the screen — unmistakably the Crab. The Seestar had nailed the target on the first try. I left it running while I went inside to warm up and watch TV. When I returned before bed, it had quietly accumulated more than 90 minutes of data. The live-stacked image already showed color and the classic filamentary tendrils. A bit of elementary post-processing the next day produced a genuinely respectable image.

Not bad for a telescope the size of a thermos.

Chasing the Pleiades

Another target I absolutely wanted to test was M45, to see whether the Seestar could pull out the delicate blue reflection nebulosity around the cluster. I used the “extended field” mode, which stitches slightly offset frames to widen the field of view – a clever trick for large objects.

It worked far better than I expected. After 75 minutes, the Merope Nebula was clearly visible, and the whole frame had that soft, ethereal glow that makes the Pleiades so arresting in appearance. A little post-processing turned it into another keeper.


A Productive Two Months

Over roughly eight weeks, I captured:

  • M1 (Crab Nebula)
  • M38
  • The Owl Cluster
  • M42
  • NGC 1055
  • NGC 2403

Each target reinforced the same impression: the Seestar is remarkably capable for its size and price.



Where the Seestar Stumbles

As much as I enjoyed using it, the experience wasn’t flawless.

  • Forced firmware updates: One night I had to wait for an update with no option to defer. At a dark-sky site, that would be maddening.
  • Wi-Fi frustrations: Despite tutorials and configuring the required low-bandwidth network, I never managed to get the Seestar to connect through my home Wi-Fi. Being able to run it from the comfort of my bedroom would have been amazing.
  • Occasional boot hiccups: A few times the unit simply wouldn’t connect to the iPad until I restarted it.
  • Wind sensitivity: Even with the sturdy tripod, a mildly breezy night caused enough buffeting that the Seestar rejected a large fraction of frames, causing me to abandon the imaging run.
  • Limited focal length: At 250mm, it excels at wide-field star clusters and large, bright nebulae, but for targeting the multitude of planetary nebulae or quirky galaxies (some of the object I love most) there just isn’t enough magnification there to get the job done.

Verdict: A Keeper (Just Not My Keeper… Yet)

The Seestar S50 won me over. It won’t replace my Vixen and ASI2600 for deep, detailed imaging, but it’s a delightful, capable, and genuinely fun piece of gear. The ability to set it up, walk away, and come back to a finished stack is liberating. I can easily imagine running a Seestar in the backyard on a DSO while I’m out front lucky-imaging a planet.

If ZWO ever releases a version with a longer focal length – or the ability to insert something like a 2× Barlow – I’d be seriously tempted. For now, I’ll happily borrow the HAL unit again this summer and see what else this little robot can do.